Even before the election, polls showed that more than two-thirds of Americans did not trust the media, especially what is widely called legacy media like the New York Tunes, Washington Post, ABC, CBS, along with NBC and its affiliate, MSNBC.
After a monthlong feigned "campaign of joy" that was widely gushed over by progressive pundits and Democrat collaborators, the "campaign of Joy" became a "campaign of ploy" during which 95 percent of the stories they concocted about Trump were negative, while 95 percent of the stories about Kamala were pure idolatry.
The American people did not buy the media's message, nor Kamala's.
Why?
Because Kamala's message could not be defined, and so all the media could do is preach about her message of hope, and her "aspirations" for the middle class.
However, she could never define her policies for America, because of her numerous flip flops.
Yes, Kamala will soon be a shrinking accident scene in the rear-view mirror, but who's the biggest loser.
The media, of course.
If you're a journalist but do not have the trust of your readers, listeners or viewers, you're irrelevant.
Just like the loss of trust can irreparably damage a relationship, it could also destroy the fourth estate.
When Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos announced last month that the newspaper would no longer be endorsing presidential candidates, he promptly lost 250,000 subscribers, who fretted and fumed over his perceived disloyalty to the elitists that need to have their egos massaged daily in their little leftist world.
Maybe if the Washington Post and the rest of legacy media had been more honest, forced Kamala out of her shell and made her take hard questions, she could've made a case to be the leader of the free world.
But upon the behest of her campaign, they took part in the bubble wrap strategy.
Guess what? The bubble popped.
I guess the lunacy media, I mean legacy media will have to find a different path, too, yet I don't really know where they're trying to go.