NEW HAMPSHIRE’S FASTEST GROWING ONLINE NEWSPAPER

N.H. has the third highest property tax burden in the country, study finds

Comment   Print
Related Articles

Each year, the average American household spends $2,471 on real-estate property taxes plus another $445 for residents of the 27 states with vehicle property taxes. With such high costs, it's no surprise that more than $14 billion in property taxes go unpaid each year, according to the National Tax Lien Association.

In order to determine who pays the most relative to their state, the personal-finance website WalletHub today released its 2022's Property Taxes State by State report, as well as expert commentary. The report compares home and vehicle taxes across the nation and features insights from a panel of experts.

States with Highest Real-Estate Taxes States with Highest Vehicle Property Taxes
43. New York 43. Kansas
44. Nebraska 44. Massachusetts
45. Texas 45. Maine
46. Wisconsin 46. South Carolina
47. Vermont 47. Connecticut
48. Connecticut 48. Missouri
49. New Hampshire 49. Rhode Island
50. Illinois 50. Mississippi
51. New Jersey 51. Virginia


Key Stats:

  • Hawaii has the lowest real-estate tax, $606, which is 8.9 times lower than in New Jersey, the state with the highest at $5,419.
  • Twenty-seven states levy some form of vehicle property tax. Of those states, Louisiana has the lowest, $25, which is 40.9 times lower than in Virginia, the state with the highest at $1,023.
  • Blue States have 31.12 percent higher real-estate property taxes, averaging $2,722, than Red States, averaging $2,076.

To view the full report and your state's rank, please visit:
https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-the-highest-and-lowest-property-taxes/11585


Expert Commentary

Do people consider property taxes when deciding where to move? Should they?

"People looking to buy homes in a community absolutely do consider the property tax rate. The property tax rate (in most cases) is a representation of the level of public services available in the community. If households are considering some seemingly similar suburban municipalities, a differentiating feature may be the level of services. Some households may value the bundle of services the property tax expense represents, others may not...It is an especially important consideration for households with children as the local school system is primarily funded through local property taxes. There is a great deal of research on the regressiveness of such a framework and how it contributes to income/class/race segregation within communities and schools."
Lyndsey Rolheiser - Assistant Professor, University of Connecticut

"The financial decision of whether or not to purchase real estate needs to consider the entire bundle of costs associated with the home purchase and ownership. Those that do not consider property taxes do so at their peril. Unfortunately, property taxes are all too often overlooked by homebuyers when considering whether or not to purchase real estate. Real estate taxes vary significantly from one town to another and from one state to another, sometimes by multiples. Lenders consider all major homeownership expenses including mortgage payments, mortgage insurance premiums, homeowners insurance, homeowner association fees, and property taxes amongst the most significant. Homebuyers would be well-advised to evaluate all of these expenses as well."
Gary S. Forshner - Founder at Law Offices of Gary S. Forshner

Should certain groups of people be exempt from property taxes or be taxed at a lower rate?

"An important aspect of local property taxation is that many communities have property tax classification. This is where a community has differential tax rates for various property types. Under this scenario, communities can adjust the tax burden away from homeowners and towards commercial/industrial property owners. This can be problematic when done in the extreme as commercial/industrial property owners also consider tax rates in their location choices (especially in suburban areas). Further, they are less likely to benefit from the public services provided in the community unless they are also residents of the community. A disproportionate tax burden on non-residential property can discourage business activity. However, this is less true in urban areas where businesses are more inelastic in their sensitivity to tax costs as the benefits of being centrally located may outweigh these costs. But rising downtown land values and building owners passing through the higher tax payments to commercial renters can cause an increase in vacancies."
Lyndsey Rolheiser - Assistant Professor, University of Connecticut

"Some states and local jurisdictions exempt certain groups from property taxes, in whole or in parts, such as seniors or veterans. Where this is equitable, reduced or waived property taxes should be considered. Seniors, for instance, are most commonly on a fixed income, such as reliance on pensions and social security. In decades past the poverty rate amongst seniors was amongst the highest in the nation. Social security went a long way to resolve that, but many of our seniors are still unable to provide basic needs if, for instance, they only qualify for basic social security. Reduced taxes for groups that are traditionally lower income may be necessary to reduce poverty and where the income reflects that need lower property taxes benefits not only the individual but their families and communities as well."
Gary S. Forshner - Founder at Law Offices of Gary S. Forshner

Should local tax policy be adjusted to rely more or less on property taxes versus other forms of taxation?

"Local taxes relying upon property is a regressive tax. In other words, poor and working-class families typically pay significantly more of their income for housing than those of greater means and therefore property taxes fall more on lower- and middle-class households. Moreover, when local communities rely exclusively or substantially on property taxes, lower-income communities often struggle to provide critical services otherwise available in wealthier communities when in many cases lower-income communities have a greater need for certain services, such as police and social services. The better policy is to spread taxes for services, such as schools, infrastructure maintenance and expansion, snow and trash removal over a broader and more equitable base than local property taxes."
Gary S. Forshner - Founder at Law Offices of Gary S. Forshner

"Many urban economists will instead point to the need for a land value tax in place of, or complementary to a property tax. This form of taxation encourages the development of land to its highest and best use. Redevelopment of a single-family home into multifamily may not take place due to the increased property tax expense. Under a land value tax, the owner is not taxed on the structure so would not face the additional burden if they redeveloped to the highest and best use. The main idea here is that this form of taxation would encourage the building of additional housing in denser forms which in turn can contribute to increasing the supply of more affordable housing. Of course, this requires that zoning allows for such redevelopment. But many communities are slowing considering the harms that exclusionary zoning (strict single-family zoning) has on its residents and prospective residents and relaxing some of their strictest zoning regulations."
Lyndsey Rolheiser - Assistant Professor, University of Connecticut

Read more from:
lifestyle
Tags: 
None
Share: 
Comment Print
Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: